Microsoft Support for HTML 5 Helps Break A Logjam But Does It Matter?


This post is by Alex Williams from ReadWriteWeb


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




html5.jpgThe news broke yesterday about the Microsoft General Manager who said that that the “future of the Web is HTML 5.”

But it’s important enough for us to write about even if in the long run it still does not solve the issues with earlier versions of the Internet Explorer browser.

Sponsor

The news came from Dean Hachamovitch, Microsoft’s general manager, for Internet Explore. Of note:

“Today, video on the web is predominantly Flash-based. While video may be available in other formats, the ease of accessing video using just a browser on a particular website without using Flash is a challenge for typical consumers. Flash does have some issues, particularly around reliability, security, and performance. We work closely with engineers at Adobe, sharing information about the issues we know of in ongoing technical discussions. Despite these issues, Flash remains an important part of delivering a good consumer experience on today’s web.”

It’s this kind of development that will give more developers the confidence to build HTML 5 apps. But does it really matter that much? IE has been hands off in how it deals with support for HTML 5 on its existing browsers. Further, full support for HTML 5 is nonexistent across Chrome, Safari, Opera, Firefox and IE. We have no release schedule for IE 9 but it will support HTML 5.

HTML 5 is very cool. But IE’s market share is not to be taken lightly.

From Psyked:

“You can’t ignore 40-60% of your users because they use a browser that isn’t up to the same standard as its competitors. I’d dearly like too, but I can’t. Which means everything has to be developed without HTML5 & CSS 3, either using browser targeting and using multiple styles and coding options, or developed to the lowest common denominator – IE.

You might say that things will eventually catch up – but considering IE6 is still at 10% market share, you’re always going to be developing something for IE6, or IE7, or IE8. None of which have very much HTML5 support at all. IE9 isn’t going to be available for users on Windows XP, which means the best they’ll ever get is IE8, which means… argh, this really isn’t going to work.”

Microsoft’s acknowledgement should be viewed as a positive one for developers. HTML 5 can be used universally on any device. Google thinks that’s important. It’s good to see Microsoft showing that sentiment, too.

But still, let’s not give this too much credence, either. Microsoft’s first allegiance is to Silverlight. That’s not going to change.

We referenced a Forrester viewpoint post last week that illustrates the reality of the situation:

“Will HTML 5 make rich Internet application (RIA) technologies such as Adobe Flash/Flex and Microsoft Silverlight obsolete? For at least the next five years, the answer is a definite “no”; inconsistent implementations of the draft HTML 5 specification and immature tooling make building HTML 5 apps that work consistently across browsers and operating systems a real challenge. Furthermore, this “either/ or” scenario is driven only by vendor politics, not by developer realities. Ultimately, HTML 5 and RIA platforms will be complementary technologies, and enterprise development shops will need to invest in both approaches to deliver expressive applications that combine reach and richness.”

Well, vendor politics will always be rich in themselves. In the meantime, HTML 5 sure is sexy. Unfortunately, it may be a while before we see how beautiful it really is.

Discuss


How JavaScript will lead the way to open video


This post is by Shay David from VentureBeat


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




Editor’s note: This story is part of our Microsoft-sponsored series on cutting-edge innovation. Shay David is the vice president of business and community development at Kaltura, a company offering video tools for publishers.

The “open Web”, a vision for the future of the Internet that is participatory, collaborative, and free from vendor lock-in is finally coming to fruition. Following Mozilla Firefox’s successful wedge of open Web standards into the browser platform, today we see every browser vendor and every web-enabled device gravitating towards supporting a vendor-neutral platform for rich media web experiences.

Like many contentious agreements, the devil is in the details — and there are a lot of details. This article will highlight how the industry is transitioning away from targeting a single vendor (Adobe Flash) for rich media web experiences to instead targeting multiple rich media web browsers. In this environment, middle-layer solutions will bridge the small differences between implementations.

Businesses looking to take advantage of the promise of a single platform to deliver rich web experiences should also be looking towards middle layer solutions to help bridge the small gaps in rich media implementations.

The open Web has traditionally faced significant challenges when it comes to the handling of rich media, including video, audio and multi-media. Rich media on the web has been a battle ground for proprietary solutions for years. Adobe Flash has won the current battle and is now the de facto standard for rich media on the desktop web. But it’s not supported by the iPhone or the iPad. [Editor’s note: In fact, Apple chief executive Steve Jobs published a long essay this week criticizing Flash.] The new specifications for rich-media handling that are part of HTML5, the latest version of the basic language of the Web, are a great leap forward in addressing these challenges. They specify a vendor neutral, device neutral way of including rich media in webpages, just like images are handled today.

However, HTML5 requires a transition period. Until there is wide industry adoption and universal agreement on all the details of the specification, systems will be required to support existing media playback systems in cases where HTML5 is not supported. In the next few years, we will likely see open source JavaScript middle layers drawing from both Flash and HTML5 to build robust solutions for rich media web experiences. This robustness will include handling everything from analytics to playlists. During this transition period, developers can use JavaScript middle layers to bridge the current gaps between Flash and HTML5, in order to provide a unified user experience regardless of the browser and the underlying technologies that are used.

Some background about HTML5 and the future of rich-media on the Web

HTML5 aims to reduce the need for proprietary plugin-based rich Internet applications. The promise of HTML5 is that developers can write rich-media applications once, and run it on any browser, on any device, from PCs through tablets and smartphones to set-top boxes and IP-enabled televisions.

The HTML5 working group, WHATWG, is trusted with the mission of upgrading the web to support rich web experiences without dependence on proprietary technologies. True to its mission, the group has been operating in a very open manner. While key working group members are employed by major vendors, the standard creation process is open and encourages large-scale participation from web developers and browser engineers.

With all major browser vendors providing feedback or working implementations as the spec evolves, there is room for innovation while addressing a wide range of stakeholder concerns. This is no small task when vendors like Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Adobe compete for dominance in an area of rich-media, which they all perceive to be key for the future of the Web. With Microsoft’s announcement a few weeks ago that HTML5 will be supported in the next release of Internet Explorer, the standard got a big boost. But while the standard sets a high bar for interoperability, debates about the underlying technologies put the whole endeavor in jeopardy.

The most heated debate revolves around the codec agnostic nature of the HTML5 video tag. Many open web advocates promoted the idea of having a baseline, royalty-free codec supported by all the browsers be part of the specification. However when trying to get convince all the stakeholders, the standard was not able to specify a standard codec, leaving codec selection open to vendors. As a result, Apple’s Safari and Microsoft IE9 support the h.264 codec, Google Chrome supports h.264 & OGG, and Firefox exclusively supports OGG/Theora. The situation is further complicated by multiple delivery options. For example, an Apple platform will support Apple http adaptive streaming while the Google Chrome browser can only decode normal http h.264 assets, and Microsoft is likely to support Silverlight Smoothstream as a delivery option.

In other words, although all the browser vendors are participating in the HTML5 standard around video, it does not nessesaraly mean the same video with the same web page will work on all browsers.

For example, imagine a visitor who comes to your site with IE6 and Flash, or with iPad and Safari. Delivering a high quality web video experience becomes almost impossible once again, despite the standard, as the codec and delivery options require once again browser specific and device specific behavior. Moreover, as we have seen with other standards, there are likely to be many idiosyncrasies among other HTML5 feature implementations, or simply incomplete support among browsers. This will make it even more difficult to take advantage of the new features without leaving a sizable percentage of web visitors literally in the dark.

In this context, it is clear to see why the proprietary platforms like Adobe’s Flash will probably be around for quite some time.

We have been here before

If you rewind the Web a few years back, you may remember the nightmarish undertaking it was to develop any rich web experience that supported all the browsers of the day. This was not only because the browsers were not mature but also because we lacked quality JavaScript libraries that could handle browser detection and act appropriately. The latest development models were outdated.

In early 2006, jQuery hit the scene and changed the way web applications were developed and deployed. jQuery supported the emergence of new paradigms that fit what web developers actually needed. The JavaScript layer with open source development methodology enabled developers to share workarounds and chain together shortcuts of common tasks. This enabled developers to quickly build innovative rich web experiences without having to worry so much about the increasingly complicated set of underling web platforms.

Today it’s hard to imagine building a web application without using a JavaScript framework. jQuery alone is used by nearly 30 percent of the top 10,000 web sites.

In much the same way, we anticipate JavaScript libraries to emerge as bridges between the underling complexities of delivering a robust HTML5 feature set. Web developers will not have to worry about technicalities such as how their video will be played back or how their cross domain request will work. Rather, they will just issue the high level call and the underling JavaScript library will automatically map to HTML5 or Flash accordingly, allowing web developers to focus on the innovative aspects of their application, not its “plumbing”. The browser platforms are rapidly evolving to include full parity with desktop applications, including features such as 3D graphics and offline storage. As more web applications begin to make use of these feature sets, workarounds and solutions for older browsers or specific platforms and devices will become even more critical.

HTML5video.org and Kaltura’s JS library

Kaltura has developed one such library to handle HTML5 video, and has created an industry resource to get developers involved. The library was developed in partnership with the Wikimedia Foundation to handle video on Wikipedia, where only patent unencumbered free formats are supported. Kaltura’s HTML5 media library uses a “fallback” method to automatically provide the viewer with the optimal viewing experience by detecting the browser and supported formats on the backend, and displaying the right content in the right format and right container while maintaining a single look & feel and feature set. For example, if you want to deliver an h.264 video to a Firefox client, the Kaltura library would automatically switch to a Flash player in a manner that is completely transparent to the developers’ custom interface components.

To learn more, to experience HTML5 video in action, to give feedback, to get involved and to become part of changing the way video is done on the Web, go to www.HTML5Video.org.

[Thanks to Michael Dale for help with an early draft of this post.]

The community responds

– Charles McCathieNevile, Chief Standards Officer, Opera

JavaScript libraries have become a critical tool for web developers, and they have come a long way since Macromedia produced probably the first really widely-used basic effect libraries in the last century. In particular they are helpful in dealing with cross-browser testing. Some demos do not recognize that Opera on my Mac understands HTML5 video and the free Ogg format, and want to give me a Flash version – they would obviously benefit from a well-written and well-maintained library. Likewise, libraries are important in reducing coding errors; copying in an entire maintained library is easier than remembering to write all the right pieces of code yourself.

But video does need to be coded in different versions for the time being — while more or less automatable, that’s still a piece of work you have to get right before the scripts can do all their magic. And the libraries need to be built well and used properly.

While these libraries are an important part of the solution, and for many authors will be indispensable until we get agreement on a free standard for video format, we need to remember that reaching that particular nirvana actually has practical benefit for the world — less need for script libraries means less processing, less battery used, less bandwidth, fewer programming errors (one of the original problems that the libraries already help to minimize) and a Web that works better.

– Caleb Elston, Vice President of Products, Justin.tv

It’s exciting to see the enthusiasm and support that browser vendors and technology companies have thrown behind HTML 5 video, but there are still issues to be resolved before we make a big move to adopt it. Our goal is to make live video part of the everyday web experience, and that means being wherever users are and creating a great experience — HTML 5 isn’t the way to do that, at least not yet.

First, supporting two new video codecs in H.264 and Theroa for a massive video library, like Justin.tv’s, is extremely painful; we hope to see unification on that front. Second, only a small percentage of our users even have the ability to view HTML5 video, and as a startup we will continue to focus on serving as large an audience as possible to grow our business. Finally, Justin.tv users embed their live and past broadcasts all over the web, and we have yet to find an easy way to make embeds usable on sites that limit Javascript use, like WordPress.com and Google’s Blogger.

While HTML5 is technically exciting, we only care about what our users actually experience, and today we do not see much user benefit to HTML5 video in desktop browsers.

Tags:

Companies: , , , ,


Only 27.3% Of Android Phones Can Use The Official Twitter Client


This post is by Jason Kincaid from TechCrunch


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




Earlier today Twitter released its official Twitter app for Android — a move that’s been expected since CEO Ev Williams announced that it was coming during Twitter’s Chirp conference. In our post, we mentioned that this was only going to be available for Android 2.1, and as others have pointed out, that means we have another case of Android’s lingering fragmentation problem rearing its ugly head. But just how bad is it? We don’t have to guess.

Two weeks ago, Google updated the Platform Versions section of the official Android website, which gives the most accurate breakdown of Android fragmentation you’re going to find — it looks at how many devices running each version of the OS have accessed the official Android Market. At the time 27.3% of devices were running 2.1; 2.7% were running 2.0.1, and nearly 70% of the devices being used were on either Android 1.5 or 1.6.

Google hadn’t updated the page in four months (this is the first update since the Nexus One was released). It’s pretty clear that it was waiting for the rollout of Android 2.1 to the Motorola Droid, which took place in early April.

Obviously the majority of phones won’t be able to use the Twitter app, nor can they access the newer features Google has been rolling out with the upgraded versions of Android. Google isn’t fully to blame for this — some phone manufacturers are running custom builds of Android and are slow to upgrade (or simply don’t intend to). But developers will be looking to Google to find a way to deal with the fragmentation issue. My hunch is that things will get better at Google I/O next month, when we can expect plenty of Android-related announcements.

Here’s the full breakdown:


Posterous Starts Automatically Inserting Affiliate Links Into Sites, Forgets To Tell Users


This post is by Jason Kincaid from TechCrunch


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




We’ve been tracking super-simple publishing service Posterous for quite a while now, and for the most part they’ve turned us into big fans. Unfortunately, they’ve just committed a fairly serious blunder. In a post earlier today, one Posterous user stumbled across the fact that his site was automatically converting all of his links to affiliate links using VigLink. There isn’t anything sinister about VigLink — the service helps publishers generate revenue without having to manually insert affiliate links themselves, and has received funding from Google Ventures, First Round Capital, and some prominent angel investors. But Posterous neglected to inform its users that it was starting to monetize all of their links, which is a breach of user trust.

Co-founder Sachin Agarwal agrees — in a phone interview he conceded that Posterous should definitely have informed users about the change (they’re currently drafting a statement about the incident). Agarwal says that Posterous has actually been testing the VigLink integration for months, which means the links have gone unnoticed for quite a while. But he says it’s just an experiment, and that Posterous hasn’t decided if it’s going to be keeping them in the long-term (though he agrees they should have informed users regardless).

Agarwal also says that if Posterous does wind up permanently integrating VigLink, users won’t have to take part in the program. And there’s an upside: once they’ve built the infrastructure to support it, Posterous has plans to allow its users to generate revenue from links on their own blogs, which could actually drive more people to start using the publishing platform.

It’s worth pointing out that while VigLink will convert any normal links to affiliate links whenever possible, it will ignore any links that are already connected to affiliate programs (in other words, it doesn’t overwrite existing affiliate links).


City of LA: Despite what you’ve heard, we still like Google


This post is by Anthony Ha from VentureBeat


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




It looked earlier today like Google’s work with one of its most high-profile Apps customers, the city government of Los Angeles, might be hitting some speed bumps. TechCrunch spotted a city memo stating that some early users complained about “issues and problems that have negatively affected their productivity and department operations,” leading to the extension of the pilot program and presumably delaying full implementation.

Does that mean the City of Los Angeles’ relationship with Google is on the rocks? That would be a black mark for Google Apps, the company’s bundle of online office tools like Gmail and Google Docs. Google loves to trot out LA as an example of an enormous organization entrusting its operations to web-based apps.

But a Google spokesman told me that the concerns had been overstated, and he pointed me towards a blog post from Kevin Crawford, who is managing LA’s Apps rollout:

The above issues are part of a normal Pilot and review process and [are] a normal part of a well-thought out project schedule — most large rollouts (with any technology) are built with flexible timeframes so issues can be addressed. … This is all NORMAL stuff happening here and the project is still on track to deliver per the schedule!

That sounds like a reasonable explanation. Although I suppose cloud computing skeptics could also read the post as an attempt to put a happy face on real problems.

And if you want to compare, here’s more detail from the initial letter:

At the meeting [for pilot participants] many of the departments expressed concerns about both the performance and the functionality of the new system. Performance concerns focused on the slowness with which e-mails were sent, received, and accessed in the new system. Functionality concerns focused on features currently available in GroupWise that are unavailable, or significantly different, in Google’s system. Further, the Los Angeles Police Department indicated that several security issues have yet to be resolved, and that a pilot of its technical support staff must be successfully completed before it can be expanded to the rest of the LAPD.

[image: Flickr/kla4067]

Tags: ,

Companies:


AT&T On The iPad 3G Video Restrictions: “That’s something you need to ask Apple”


This post is by MG Siegler from TechCrunch


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




Today in the U.S. people are getting their hands on the 3G version of the iPad for the first time. The hardware is supposed to be exactly the same as the WiFi-only version except, of course, it has a cell chip in it to receive data over AT&T’s 3G network when you’re not connected to WiFi. Since the hardware is basically the same, all the apps should function the same, right? Wrong.

Reports are already coming in that some of the most popular iPad apps — the ones that stream video — are being restricted on the new iPad 3G. Specifically, the YouTube app scales videos down to a “dramatically lower resolution over the cellular data connection,” according to iLounge. Worse, the ABC Player apparently won’t work at all unless you connect to a WiFi network, as a pop-up message informs the user. But apparently iTunes Store streaming video previews are working just fine in full resolution. No word on the Netflix app just yet.

I reached out to AT&T for comment on what’s going on. Are we going to see AT&T restricting services again (remember, in the U.S. we still have no tethering option) so their network isn’t flooded? The only response I got was, “That’s something you need to ask Apple.

I asked for clarification on that — does that mean that Apple is the one restricting the app/data, or that they’re the only ones who can comment on the matter? I have yet to hear back. I’ll update when I do. I’ve also reached out to Apple on the matter, but I doubt I’ll hear back from them.

Update: An AT&T spokesperson has responded with the following, “It’s just a question for Apple.” That’s almost an Apple-like response.

Update 2: A commenter on the iLounge post notes:

Seems some people (from what I have been told) are finding out its not AT&T that is blocking the video for the sakes of blocking video over 3G… Seems that ABC is streaming to large of a video file (or something along these lines). So ABC needs to fix there app, NETFLIX is working fine over 3G.

That could make sense as it relates to the size of the file actually being streamed as well (though overall size shouldn’t matter). On the iPhone, video is often scaled-down when network signal weakens to give optimal performance. Since even the fastest AT&T 3G connection is slower than WiFi, perhaps ABC’s quality exceeds some limit and is unable to scale down. But it’s hard to know anything for sure without either company commenting beyond “talk to them.”

Update 3: Business Insider’s Dan Frommer writes the following on Twitter:

ABC is wifi only on purpose. I believe rights play a role. (they’re different on wifi vs 3G) sounds dumb but true.

abc told me “the decision was based on a variety of business and technical considerations.” but no details


Education 2.0: The importance of ownership


This post is by Rob Tucker from O'Reilly Radar - Insight, analysis, and research about emerging technologies.


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




I’ve been teaching adults for almost twenty years. First as a lecturer, then as a professor and for the last ten years as a coach and facilitator for large organizations all over the world. I love technology and the possibility that it represents but I believe that technology can only ever enable educational success. It rarely drives. As technology becomes more pervasive we must shift our focus to the driving factors. I would argue that a key driver for educational success is the internal sense of ownership each student has for his or her own development. If they have this, they will find a way to succeed. If they don’t, the technology enables ever greater levels of complacency.

For example, companies offer more and better educational content to their employees each year via technology. The delivery mechanisms become more sophisticated, the market analysis and demographic segmentation become more precise. The richness of the experience and the connectedness of the learning with the world beyond the classroom becomes ever-broader. Do employees learn more today than they did in 1970? In 1900? I’m not sure. I’ve seen no compelling evidence either way. The ones who really want to learn, learn more. The self-starters learn more. The employees of the best companies learn at a breathtaking pace but that has more to do with these company’s ability to attract those who are committed to their own self development than it does with the quality of the educational technology. Students who own their own development use new technology well – it serves as an accelerant to their educational success. But the accelerant is not the spark.

This is the case for adults – employees in the world’s largest and richest organizations. Is it the case for children? I don’t know. Probably.

I was hiking with my son yesterday. It was a long hike for a boy his age and he asked me, “Dad, do your feet hurt?” I turned my head as we walked and said, “Yeah. They hurt. But not all hurting is bad and you wanted to get to the top of the hill. Do you want to stop?” He thought about it for a long while, ten, maybe twenty steps and said, “no, but my feet hurt too. I’ll be glad when we get to the top.” Ed 2.0 won’t make our feet not hurt. We’ll just be hiking to more wonderous places.

Ed 2.0 won’t be a kinder and gentler place, free from conflict and strife. It will be a hard place. A place where trolls and naysayers and those who would discourage others have the same loud microphone as anyone else. For each online Gandhi, an online bully. It will be a confusing place. A painful place. It will also be a wonderful place, a place where real liberation and intellectual progress will be possible in ways and on a scale we have never seen in human history.

Ed 2.0 isn’t only or even primarily about technology. It is about arming students with the tools and the fierce determination they will need to learn with and through that technology. It is about encouraging intellectual entrepreneurship – creating of our students hundreds of millions of one-person startups, kludging their way to happiness and success.

Ed 2.0 is about encouraging ownership – genuine heartfelt ownership of one’s own educational destiny. The institutions will transform faster than we can keep pace. Between the cracks of our existing educational infrastructure will grow varied species of educational delivery the likes of which we have never seen and cannot possibly forecast. What our students will need is a love of learning but we should not mistake this for an easy love affair. A love of learning is a hard relationship. Learning hurts sometimes. Learning is scary most of the time. It’s impact is all-too-often proportional to its agony. As Benjamin Franklin described it, “Those things that hurt, instruct.”

To paraphrase MLK, we must teach our students that suffering is redemptive and that that redemption takes the form of learning. Ed 2.0 is teaching a student what to do when the system doesn’t work, when the teacher is bad, when the school is failing, when the district is broke. The answer in each case is to rise above the failure and to use the power of technology to surmount each barrier. That’s the real model of liberation with technology – it’s not the gleaming cities of glass, it’s the kluge with wires poking out, too much Cat 5 cable, and the fuses in your house always on the edge of tripping because you’re downloading too much information. It’s turning on the fire hose. It’s taking the spark that is the desire to learn and building into an unquenchable fire.

Tesla Motors IPO faces new risk: CEO’s divorce trial


This post is by Owen Thomas from VentureBeat


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




The personal life of Tesla Motors chief executive Elon Musk might muddy the waters for his company’s plans to go public.

In Silicon Valley, business can be personal. Tech companies preparing to go public routinely note how dependent they are on the services of their top executives. High-profile electric automaker Tesla Motors is planning an initial public offering of stock and developing an all-electric sedan, the Model S. But the company is staying silent on the matter of its CEO Elon Musk’s pending week-long divorce trial, which begins Monday in Van Nuys, Calif.

The trial is significant because it could lead to him losing control of the company. Depending on how the trial goes, the divorce could force him to give a significant portion of his shares to his wife, and that has several ramifications for Tesla and its IPO.

Documents filed with the Superior Court of Los Angeles show that the divorce case is now scheduled for a five-day trial starting Monday, May 3. Elon Musk, who separated in the summer of 2008 from his wife Justine, a successful novelist, has previously characterized his divorce proceedings as friendly.

“This trial involves a contest over a postmarital agreement that was signed” in March 2000, six weeks after their marriage, according to Marshall Zolla, Justine Musk’s lawyer. “This aspect of the trial is not amicable.”

An ugly divorce would normally be mere fodder for celebrity weeklies. But under California’s community property laws, Justine Musk could gain stakes in Tesla and Elon Musk’s other companies, SolarCity and Space Exploration Technologies, Zolla said.

“Justine Musk is seeking to set aside the postnuptial agreement because of Elon Musk’s breach of his fiduciary duty to her,” said Zolla. “The interest in Tesla Motors, SpaceX, and SolarCity, she is contending are community property.”

Elon Musk’s personal shareholdings in Tesla are a matter of deep interest to potential shareholders. The company has a $465 million loan from the Department of Energy. One condition of the loan, according to the company’s most recent S-1 filing:

“[Our] DOE Loan Facility provides that we will be in default under the facility in the event Mr. Musk and certain of his affiliates fail to own, at any time prior to one year after we complete the project relating to the Model S, at least 65% of the capital stock held by Mr. Musk and such affiliates as of the date of the DOE Loan Facility.”

A default under the loan could affect development and production of the Model S and other parts of Tesla’s business, according to Tesla’s S-1 filing:

“Any failure to obtain the DOE funds or secure other alternative funding could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects. Such additional or alternative financing may not be available on attractive terms, if at all, and could be more costly for us to obtain. As a result, our plans for building our Model S and electric powertrain manufacturing plants could be significantly delayed which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.”

A diminution of Elon Musk’s stake in Tesla could also unsettle the balance of the board of directors, most of whom were appointed by him or his representatives. VantagePoint Venture Partners, an investor in Tesla Motors, had previously sought to reduce Elon Musk’s control over the board, according to a source close to the company. Any reduction in Elon Musk’s stake could open the company up to boardroom maneuvering, which could have an unpredictable impact on the company’s strategy, as well as Musk’s commitment to Tesla.

A representative for VantagePoint said no one was immediately available to comment on the firm’s relationship with Elon Musk. A lawyer for Elon Musk did not return calls requesting comment.

Ricardo Reyes, a spokesman for Tesla Motors, said, “We don’t expect the case to have an impact on the S-1 filing.”

Here’s the family court case file summary:


Case file: Elon and Justine Musk Divorce Trial

[Photo: OnInnovation]

Companies: ,

People: , ,


Lessons Learned: April Post Roundup for Startups


This post is by Audrey Watters from ReadWriteWeb


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




Many of our posts here on ReadWriteStart offer tips on launching your startup and insights on how to become a successful entrepreneur.

But as the saying goes, hindsight is often 20/20, and in that spirit we offer a round up of lessons learned from the month of April.

Sponsor

Build Customers, Not Just Products: Devver co-founder Ben Brincherhoff describes the dangers of emphasizing product development at the expense of customer development.

Respond Promptly to a PR Crisis: Blippy‘s response to a leak of customers’ credit card information points to the importance of responding quickly and correctly to potential public relations disasters.

Pay Attention to the Technical and the Business Aspects: Startups need to balance both the technical and business sides, as WePay co-founder Rich Aberman advises.

Retain Customer Trust: Responding to ongoing allegations about improprieties, Yelp lifted the veil on its review system, demonstrating the importance in being transparent and open in order to maintain both customer trust and company reputation.

Know When to Veer Off-Course: As Spark Capital” partner Bijan Sabet argues, it’s important to be nimble and know when to divert from the project roadmap.

Hire the Right Execs: This post looks at Ben Horowitz’s thoughts on how startups can be sure to put the right executives in place.

Have an Exit Strategy: Although the speculation continues about whether or not Foursquare plans to sell, discussions between the popular location-based service and Yahoo serve as a reminder that having an exit strategy can help you shape the direction of your business.

Although these posts document realizations entrepreneurs have had in hindsight, hopefully other entrepreneurs can learn from these lessons and use them to be better equipped for the future.

Discuss


The Short and Illustrious History of Twitter #Hashtags


This post is by Liz Gannes from GigaOM


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




With Twitter having made its way to the mainstream, one early tweeting convention has brought a nerdy flavor along for the ride. It can be a bit jarring to come across Heidi Montag tweeting about her “#superficial_album,” using the pound sign to make her tweets more likely to appear in searches and become trending topics. Though we might forget where that # originated, the record shows where credit is due — and it’s to an individual Twitter user.

On August 23, 2007, the Twitter hashtag was born. Invented by Chris Messina (then with the consulting firm Citizen Agency, now an open web advocate for Google), the first tweet with a hashtag read as follows: “how do you feel about using # (pound) for groups. As in #barcamp [msg]?”

Today, hashtags make tweets more meaningful and findable, traits that many users appreciate. No conference or speech is complete without a hashtag these days, binding together the ad-hoc community of observers and their pithy comments and memorable quotes. Another prominent use of hashtags is to generate memes — the sort of stuff you would see on a chain-letter quiz — for instance, #10yearsago was popular around Jan. 1 of this year, when people remembered how they welcomed Y2K, and #ff is popular every Friday, when users recommend other accounts they like to follow. Hashtags are also a prominent form of Twitter humor, offering the author the chance to contradict what they’re saying or poke fun — for instance, a friend of mine often uses the hashtag #mylifeissohard. There’s also, of course, plenty of hashtag spam, and plenty of Justin Bieber. (The site “What the Trend” is a trove for this stuff.)

According to Twitter, 11 percent of tweets now contain hashtags. This is on a platform that sees more than 50 million tweets per day. Depending on how geeky or meme-y your user base is, the hashtag count certainly goes up. Alessio Signorini, a PhD candidate at the University of Iowa, recently found 15 percent of 275 million randomly selected tweets contained hashtags. Messina said there are hashtags in probably 30 percent of the tweets from people he follows.

Back in the <strike>spring</strike> summer of 2007, Messina proposed the hashtag as a way to group conversations on Twitter, which was then an incredibly simple messaging service (of course, it still is, but a lot has changed). The inspiration for the convention came from channels on IRC and the Twitter competitor Jaiku. The # would denote metadata about a tweet, rather than the content of the tweet itself. Messina called them “channel tags.” He wrote via email today, “In the beginning people really hated them! People didn’t understand why we needed hashtags, and the biggest complaint was that people just didn’t like how they looked.”

Though hashtags might have been a little ugly and awkward, they were useful from the outset. Back then Twitter offered a push-based service called Track (since discontinued) where users could set up notifications on any term, and that worked particularly well with hashtags. What the company didn’t offer was search (it later bought Summize to fix this problem), and tracking hashtags was a sort of substitute, helping users find and organize tweets. Hashtags are also “folksonomic,” meaning they give organization that is ad hoc, with no rigid structure or approval system.

Messina's mockup of recent and popular channel tags for Twitter executives.

Messina pitched hashtags to Twitter’s execs back in the day, he said, and even mocked up a couple of pages that showed popular hashtags (still called channels) the exact same way Twitter treats trending topics today. But the Twitter team deemed them too nerdy, and said they’d prefer to use machine learning to filter tweet topics, according to Messina.

Adoption of the hashtag initially seemed to be mostly by Messina himself, who used them profusely to mark where he was tweeting from and what it was about, until around October of ’07. During the San Diego forest fires, when people tweeting about the emergency used the same hashtag at Messina’s urging and by following the example set by other citizen journalists.

Around the same time, Republicans seeking to keep Congress in session to vote on an energy bill started tweeting with the hashtag #dontgo. In Messina’s recollection, that was hashtag’s big break “out of the geekosphere.”

Messina said that in retrospect, he’s especially proud of inventing hashtags “because they’re a hack and they prove that simple solutions are often the best ways to solve a problem, rather than waiting for a technology solution.”

Ever the tinkerer, Messina now thinks hashtags are overused and that there should be different types of metadata markers, for instance /via, /cc and /by. Those have been christened “slashtags,” but they haven’t caught on quite as well.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

The Dos and Don’ts of Social Media Marketing

Google Checkout Web Element Simplifies E-Commerce


This post is by Louis Gray from louisgray.com


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post





In a simple Friday update, Google’s Web Elements team rolled out a number of new options for Web site owners to integrate the company’s tools in their content. Among the updates was a new offering for Google Checkout, which, when used in combination with Google Docs, presents a very easy way for people to create online stores – for everything from physical goods to eBooks and services, depending on what you offer.

While Google Checkout has not enjoyed the market awareness and penetration of its competition, PayPal, the new offering lets users create their own marketplace on their own Web site, instead of resorting to other common methods, such as Yahoo! Stores or the Amazon Marketplace.

To create a store, one needs to make a new spreadsheet in Google Docs, with corresponding SKUs for the products, enter a price, and the total number of products available. Other features, including graphics and varieties of products are optional.

Web Elements comes into play when you link this database to the new Checkout gadget. As you can see below, I made a quick one to offer eBooks, product reviews or even one-day consulting. Depending on the store, you could of course sell specific goods, and draw down from your inventory – including the option of presenting a standard price for shipping and handling.

Once the gadget is created, you can post it to your blog, add it as a sidebar for your Web site, or just grab the HTML and post it elsewhere. All told, it’s a solid way for individuals and small businesses to get into simple E-commerce without too many headaches.

Of note, while the offerings and prices for my demo are clearly examples only, if you hit the buy button and send cash my way, I am sure we can figure out something. So go for it.

My Demo Google Checkout Gadget from Web Elements:

Weekend Reading: Money Magnet, by Jacoline Loewen


This post is by Chris Cameron from ReadWriteWeb


Click here to view on the original site: Original Post




magnet_apr10.jpgHere on ReadWriteStart we are often providing resources and tips for young companies looking to raise funding from venture capitals and angel investors. This week’s recommendation for our Weekend Reading series, Money Magnet: How to Attract Investors to Your Business by Jacoline Loewen, is a book aimed at helping entrepreneurs learn how to deal with financing and how to make their businesses attractive to investors.

Sponsor

Author Jacoline Loewen is a Canadian business consultant and strategy writer who has aided companies seeking capital and private equity. In Money Magnet, Loewen provides valuable lessons she has learned from her career on raising capital in a style that is “informative, relaxed and easy to understand,” according to book’s description. Though the book was published in 2008, and most of Loewen’s work involves multi-million dollar businesses, there are still some lessons startups can likely take away from the book.

moneymagnet_apr10.jpgMoney Magnet is a bit like Fundraising 101. Loewen describes the various types of investors, how to meet and pitch to them, how to read term sheets and how to handle relationships with investors as companies grow. She also provides a run down of the important things investors look for from potential companies, as well as the “four brutal questions” they all ask. The first question most investors ask, she says, is “Are you the right people to make this happen?”

“The teams most likely to attract money will be those that demonstrate they will roll up their sleeves, get on with the unglamorous grunt work of operating plans and do things just a little bit better,” writes Loewen. “Anyone new to running a company who has a good idea and now wants funding, probably will not get the money, no matter how smooth they appear. No one, except your mom, is going to fund your learning curve.”

It’s interesting that she singles out all entrepreneurs with no experience and says they will most likely not get any funding for their idea. Depending on the VCs they seek out, this may be true, but there are plenty of opportunities for inexperienced entrepreneurs to get funding, though the odds are leaning against them. The other questions she says all investors will ask center around the investment opportunity, sustainability and return on investment – questions which will all essentially prove your readiness to get the company off the ground.

Loewen’s insider view into the investment process provides an unique perspective for startups looking to meet and woo potential investors. Most advice on the subject comes from either the entrepreneurs involved in the deals or the venture capitalists doling out the cash, so an angle from a consultant who has facilitated numbers of deals is certainly a fresh one.