Next Jump Shoppers Have Burned More Than 1.6 Billion WOWPoints, Each Worth A Penny

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


Next Jump CEO Charlie Kim wants you to earn and burn his company’s WOWPoints, a loyalty reward currency that can be used to pay for real merchandise. WOWPoints are redeemable for thousands of offers on Next Jump’s at a rate of one penny per point. Since it launched WOWPoints two years ago, more than 1.6 billion have been burned. Currently, people are burning WOWPoints at the rate of 100 million a month, which translates to $1 million worth of discounts every month across thousands of products not only on, but also on corporate rewards sites which Next Jump operates.

Next Jump is making it easer to earn points with a concept called Family Points, which lets families pool their points together to encourage even bigger purchases. That could come in handy for travel discounts. The points can be applied to any offer across the various marketplaces Next Jump operates, including daily deals from LivingSocial. But the points aren’t really about daily deals, they are more about loyalty.

A daily deal is usually an attempt to acquire new customers by offering a huge discount. Points can also be seen as discounts, but at a smaller scale. Instead of a 50 percent discount, WOWPoints typically amount to a 2 to 3 percent discount, sometimes as high as 10 percent. Kim believes there is aplace for daily deals, but that the vast majority of deals should be smaller rewards for loyalty. “Profits come with loyal customers and it is the hardest thing to build,” he notes.

The idea behind WOWPoints is a loyalty reward system that works across merchants. As Next Jump adds new ways to earn points, more people are using them. The points drive the purchase loop and the company hopes will make them loyal to or other Next Jump properties. For more background on Next Jump, read this post.

Launch Date:

Headquartered in New York City, Next Jump is building the next generation of e-commerce and advertising technology, and revolutionizing the way consumers and marketers interact online. The company has…

Learn more

Google May Be On The Verge Of Resurrecting “GDrive”

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


In 2006, Google was internally testing a project codenamed “Platypus”, an online storage service. When it was accidentally disclosed during an analyst meeting as “GDrive”, it quickly captured the web’s imagination. Google seemed on the verge of transforming their servers into our own personal hard drives in the cloud. Plenty of startups were working on this (and still are), but the presumption was that Google would be able to scale this beyond anyone else and do it for free, or very cheap. Google refused to talk about it, but story after story after story kept coming.

Then something weird happened: GDrive never actually launched.

It wasn’t until earlier this year that we found out what happened, thanks to Steven Levy’s book In The Plex. In 2008, GDrive was about to launch under Bradley Horowitz (now a lead on Google+), but Sundar Pichai (now the SVP of Chrome) convinced Google’s top executives not to launch it. The reason? He felt like the concept of a “file” was outdated (sounds more than a bit Jobsian) in the cloud-based universe that Google was trying to build. After some debate, the powers that be at Google agreed and GDrive was shelved, and the team moved over to the Chrome team.

End of story, right? Not so fast.

Something curious appeared this evening in the Chromium Code Reviews issue list. As first noted by Nick Semenkovich on Twitter, there was a ticket to add the URL to a list in the browser’s code. This URL (which is not yet live) lead to a Hacker News thread wondering: “Google Drive coming soon?

Diving a bit deeper into the code reviews, what’s most striking is that doesn’t appear to be referenced anywhere besides this one exposed ticket. This suggests that it’s either no big deal, or that Google is keeping this very secret.

I don’t think it’s the former because the messaging in the one ticket indicates that has been added to the HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) list alongside other key Google apps like and Another bit of code puts it alongside Android Market and Google Analytics.

Google information security engineer, Chris Evans, completed the ticket this evening. And Chrome engineer Adam Langley approved it with the message “LGTM” (Looks Good To Me).

I reached out to Pichai (who again, is now a Google senior executive in charge of Chrome), but he declined to comment. A Google spokesperson would only say, “The team is always testing out new features, but we don’t have any details to share at this time.”

It sure seems like something is up. At the very least, Google does appear to be close to doing something with the domain. My best guess — which is pure speculation — is that it will be some sort of new Google app for syncing files over the web across a range of devices. PCs, Macs, Chromebooks, Android phones, iOS, you name it. Think: Dropbox.

But wait, doesn’t Google already offer cloud storage functionality as a part of Google Docs? Sort of. But since that functionality launched almost two years ago, it seems that very few people use it like they use Dropbox — hence, Dropbox’s $4 billion valuation and’s $550 million valuation.

Google is putting a lot of weight behind Chrome OS and Chromebooks. So far, it seems they haven’t exactly caught fire in the sales department. But they’re iterating fast, and one area of focus has been the file system (despite Pichai’s hope they wouldn’t need one — remember, they’re going after PC users here). One that is built into the core of the OS and tied to the cloud could be very useful to those hoping to switch from traditional PCs. That’s especially true now that Google is finally making their apps fully available offline as well, as they did with Gmail, Docs, etc, this morning.

More to come on this, I’m sure.

[image via Google Blogoscoped from way back in 2006]

Launch Date:

25/8/2004, NASDAQ:GOOG

Google provides search and advertising services, which together aim to organize and monetize the world’s information. In addition to its dominant search engine, it offers a plethora of…

Learn more

Exclusive: Tech mastermind Kai-Fu Lee on the “parallel universe” of startups in China

This post is by from VentureBeat

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

What are the distinguishing characteristics of Chinese tech company founders?

“They are just as passionate and independent as the Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, and they work even harder!”

So said the the legendary computer scientist Kai-Fu Lee, Apple employee turned Microsoft engineer turned chief, in an interview with VentureBeat this evening.

Two years ago, Lee left Google to start his own startup incubator, Innovation Works.

Tonight, we learned Lee had raised a $180 million fund for Innovation Works. The funding had come primarily from large, multinational corporations with a strong Western presence and from a handful of elite Silicon Valley investors and VC firms.

“We are the leading incubator and very early-stage fund,” said Lee. “We are unique in that we have a large team of seasonsed professionals to assist; we take a strong view on what areas will have the greatest growth and bet on companies with billion-dollar valuation potential; and we have a sizable fund and are able to double down on winning companies.”

Lee is one of the best known “sea turtles,” those who are born in China, study abroad and then return to China to live and work. In his travels, he had observed American models of startup incubation, such as Y Combinator, but he insisted those models would not work in China.

Education, he said, is technical to the exclusion of holistic business training. Conservative parents lead to risk aversion in young would-be entrepreneurs. Harsh judgments follow any failure. And the culture and HR needs are completely different.

Ultimately, Lee said he learned that with his crop of independent, hard-working Chinese companies, “Our imperative is to provide them the best possible support system and advice, but let them run the show.”

We asked Lee also about his experiences working with Western investors who sought to have a hand in the Chinese market — a realm many see as fascinating, mysterious and potentially profitable, if certain pitfalls can be circumnavigated. “I think there is a strange bipolar view,” said Lee, “euphoria versus disbelief… The US bipolar view is largely due to lack of understanding. I am disappointed at most of the Wall Street analysts on Chinese Internet stocks.”

In trading, Chinese tech stock has been on a sharp decline throughout the month, with such recognizable names as Renren and Baidu showing heavy losses for the month and the year to date. During August, some well-known Chinese web stocks fell as much as 20, 30 or even 40 percent.

Lee continued, “But in reality, it’s not that different from the United States. Companies that have a good product and business model and a good culture that cares about users will succeed. Some companies are overvalued and maybe even bubble, but just as many are very good and show great promise. The trick is picking the winners — just like in the U.S.”

Given the climate in which Lee founded his incubator, we asked whether he thought the Chinese Internet market would always be somewhat segregated. After all, in 2009, when Lee started Innovation Works, the government censorship and surveillance program Golden Shield was getting a lot of attention from Western media outlets, which created a sense that there were two Internets: China’s and everyone else’s. And in 2010, Google (Lee’s former employer) saw its Chinese relationships break down with accusations of hacking and a newfound unwillingness to comply with censorship policies.

Without the web properties (and the APIs) so familiar to Western eyes, will China’s Internet ever be one and the same with the larger web-based ecosystem?

“For the short-term, [the Chinese Internet market] will be somewhat segregated, due to a variety of reasons,” said Lee. “But in the long-term, there will be more convergence. We are helping a few global companies come into China.

“In the meantime, it is interesting to watch, as China is almost a parallel universe where the Internet is largely the same but starting to take a different path in a few interesting places.”

Filed under: VentureBeat

King Of The Nerds: Can You Be One?

This post is by Andru Edwards from Gear Live

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Revenge Of The NerdsDo you want to be on TV and have all your nerdity exposed globally?

Of course you do, because it pays big money and we've all seen how one reality show leads to starring in yet another.

And your lucky payday is rapidly approaching.

The producers of Mythbusters, Survivor and The Amazing Race are creating a new competition-based show “embracing and celebrating passionate and intellectual guys and girls 21-30 years old.”

Y'know, the hot, cool people. Who are also fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, Harry Potter, Lord Of The Rings, and all the other great nerd media icons.

Plus, can you answers these questions with a resounding “Yeah, baby!”


King Of The Nerds: Can You Be One? originally appeared on Comix 411 on Wed, August 31, 2011 – 9:06:24

Impressive List Of U.S. Investors Drops $180 Million Into Chinese Startup Incubator

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


Kai-Fu Lee has a fairly unique perspective on the tech industry, having spent years in high roles at Apple, Microsoft, and Google. Lee spent six years as VP of Apple’s Interactive Media Group, before moving on to be chosen as the guy to forge first Microsoft’s and then Google’s inroads into China. Then, in mid-2009, Lee left Google (where the former professor and computer scientist had been involved with and beyond for over four years) amidst the growing criticism in Western media of China’s Internet policy, specifically in regards to the Golden Shield, or the Great Firewall of China, as it is fondly known.

Lee bowed out of Google seemingly at just the right time to turn his focus from the behemoths to the little guys, founding Innovation Works, an early-stage incubator for Chinese startups. Since 2009 the incubator has been solely focused on investing in and coaching young entrepreneurs in the Chinese market, and today the incubator announced that it has raised $180 million to create the so-called “Innovation Works Development Fund” (IWDF). The fund is the first dollar-based fund raised by the company to be focused on Chinese Internet startups.

According to the Innovation Works’ announcement, corporations, family funds, and institutions participated in the fund, including investors like WI Harper, Silicon Valley Bank, Sequoia Capital, IDG-Accel, Foundation Capital, Foxconn, SAP, Bertelsmann, Motorola, Autodesk, and pension funds from the U.S. and Canada.

Ron Conway and Yuri Milner were also part of the list of investors, as well as executives and former executives from top Internet companies like Google, YouTube, Facebook, Amazon, and Yahoo. While American tech companies have largely struggled to expand into the Chinese market, it’s nice to at least see American money working its way into China to support startups and the local entrepreneurial ecosystem. Hopefully, it will encourage Chinese founders to build businesses unique to the region and not Facebook/Twitter ports.

The incubator had previously raised $115 million and, to date, Innovation Works has invested in approximately 34 startups, nine of which have successfully obtained sizable Series A financing from third-party VCs, according to Lee. Innovation Works, like its American brethren TechStars and Y Combinator looks to help early-stage startup teams grow quickly with the help of mentoring services and an infusion of cash. Lee manages the fund alongside WI Harper Group.

For more, check out Innovation Works at home here.


Dr. Kai-Fu Lee is the Founder of Innovation Works. He served as Vice President, Engineering of Google Inc., and President of its Chinese Operations since July 2005.


Learn more

On 30th anniversary, HP launches limited-edition financial calculator

This post is by from VentureBeat

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

For math geeks, it doesn’t get better than this.

Hewlett-Packard is marking the 30th anniversary of its HP 12c Financial Calculator today by launching a limited-edition version aimed at nostalgic fans.

While the company hasn’t won praise for its business strategy lately, the HP 12c calculator has been one of its best-selling products ever, and it has been in continuous production for the last three decades. It shows that high-quality products can keep selling for a very long time, even if it seems like time has passed them by. Yes, geeks can be very loyal.

“It lasted this long because of the quality of it,” said Dennis Harms, the original project manager on the 12c, now working in HP’s printer division, in an interview. “We had no idea it would last this long. We thought it would have a two-year life.”

As a result of the longevity, multiple generations of people have grown up with fond memories of the 12c. In some ways, the 12c had great timing. It came out at a time when it could address most of the functions that financial experts needed, like calculating interest rates for real estate agents. And it could calculate those functions instantly. You didn’t have to wait for it to boot up. So it came with a complete feature set and it didn’t need to be replaced every year with models that were on the “faster, better, cheaper” track. That’s pretty rare for tech gadgets, which normally always benefit when they move from last year’s model to next year’s model.

HP calls this machine the “gold standard of business calculation,” and the Museum of HP Calculators calls it the “calculator that wouldn’t die.” Though it has been followed by many other models since its introduction in 1981 for $150, the device is HP’s best-selling and longest-selling calculator. It came out the same year of the launch of the space shuttle Columbia and the same year as the IBM personal computer.

The HP 12c has a landscape layout, computations that are more accurate than federal standards publications, and a keypad that lets users enter complex formulas. It has replaceable batteries and fits in a shirt pocket. The calculator is one of only two calculators permitted for use during financial professional certification exams.

“It’s too bad we can’t calculate how many deals were decided, trades transacted and loans granted with the assistance of the 12c,” said Phil McKinney, vice president and chief technology officer at the personal systems group at HP.

Harms (pictured) said that the previous calculator model suffered from quality problems. The keypads stuck and HP never shipped it. So Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard, the founders of HP, told the engineers to ship it only when it was perfect because the company’s reputation was riding on the 12c. At that time, calculators were a big part of HP’s business, which consisted mostly of selling test and measurement equipment.

“Management told us, ‘Don’t screw this up,’” Harms said.

HP built  chip factory to manufacture the two major chips for the 12c. The factory used the complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) manufacturing process, which now dominates the industry. One chip was nicknamed R2D2, after the Star Wars droid, as an abbreviation for RAM ROM Display Drive. And it had a microprocessor built with 6-micron circuitry. Now, chips can be fabricated with 32-nanometer circuits, many times smaller. (If I had a calculator handy, I would figure out how many times smaller that is). HP also used just-in-time inventory for the calculator.

That meant that it gathered its suppliers close to the factory and fed parts into the manufacturing as they were needed. The result was that HP could build 750,000 to 1 million units for the launch of the device. Retailers such as student book stores typically ordered much more than they needed because they were never sure HP would ship them enough supplies. So they ordered a lot of the new calculators — and the devices sold out. HP hasn’t quite figured out how many it has sold to date.

The new model will sell for $79.99. The calculator features Reverse Polish Notation, which improves efficiency and thereby speeds the calculation of loan payments and interest rates, time value of money, standard deviation, percent, cash flows, and other equations.

The limited edition calculator has a unique production number laser-etched on the back and is sold in an elegant gift box. HP is also reintroducing its HP 15c Scientific Calculator, first launched in 1982. That calculator was discontinued in 1989 and it lived on as a mobile app. The 15c has the same design, but the new one has 100 times faster processing speed. The 15c will sell for $99.99.

More info is available here on the history of the 12c and 15c. The 12c does have one flaw, Harms said. It has to do with date-related calculations, where it tells you what day of the month and year it will be when you ask it to calculate the date 200 days from now. You can only calculate until Nov. 16 in the year 4096. After that, you get an “out of range” error message.

Filed under: VentureBeat

Zuckerberg Tops Vanity Fair’s "New Establishment" List Again (And Look Who’s No. 40)

This post is by from AllThingsD » Kara Swisher

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Vanity Fair magazine put out its high-profile “New Establishment” list of the top 50 people, who are “an innovative new breed of buccaneering visionaries, engineering prodigies, and entrepreneurs, who quite often sport hoodies, floppy hair, and backpacks.”

The hoodie part would be referring to Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg, who topped the list — which is in the just-released October issue — for the second year in a row.

The Vanity Fair list was packed with Silicon Valley luminaries.

The No. 2 spot went to the hopelessly conjoined twins at Google, CEO Larry Page and his co-founder Sergey Brin. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos was No. 3, followed by newly born CEO Tim Cook and top product guy Jonathan Ive of Apple at No. 4, with Twitter creator and Square founder Jack Dorsey at No. 5.

Interestingly, super-VCs Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz clocked in this year at No. 6.

The digitally fast-forward Lady Gaga was the top woman on the list at No. 9, in front of “Harry Potter” author J. K. Rowling at No. 16.

And, clocking in at No. 40? Why, me and my partner-in-crime at AllThingsD, Walt Mossberg. He is apparently a “kingmaker” of tech and I do “juicy exclusives.”

That actually is pretty accurate. More importantly, we were ranked higher than Justin Timberlake and Ashton Kutcher. In other words: Mission accomplished!

We also beat the Angry Birds dudes at No. 49, whom my two kids would nonetheless have voted tops over their mom any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

In addition, Vanity Fair broke off a list of 25 “Powers That Be,” which is made up of a lot of longtime “New Establishment” folks, as well as another list called the “Hall of Fame.”

“These are the people who have shaped the world we live in today — and continue to wield enormous influence,” said Vanity Fair, which translates into dustier moguls.

Topping the powers-that-be, of course, is Apple’s co-founder and Chairman Steve Jobs. And outgone Google CEO and now Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt is now enshrined in the hall of fame.

As Walt and I head to a good table at the Minetta Tavern to meet the cool peeps for a celebratory drink, here is the official press releases from Vanity Fair:


Sergey Brin and Larry Page Take No. 2 Spot, Lady Gaga Jumps to the Top 10 of Tech-Dominant List

NEW YORK, N.Y. — “The Age of Information gives way to a burgeoning Age of Technology,” announces Graydon Carter, remarking on the “seismic shift in interest and influence” that has occurred in the 17 years that Vanity Fair has been ranking America’s power players. The magazine’s 2011 New Establishment list identifies the top 50 of an innovative new breed of buccaneering visionaries, engineering prodigies, and entrepreneurs, who quite often sport hoodies, floppy hair, and backpacks.

Mark Zuckerberg, founder of the inescapable social-networking site Facebook, maintains his perch at the top of Vanity Fair’s 17th annual New Establishment List ranking for the second year in a row. With a possible I.P.O. on the horizon by 2012, which could value the company anywhere between $50 and $100 billion, Facebook has enough clout to worry even the unshakable Google. Zuckerberg is still the youngest person ever to top the list.

Sergey Brin and Larry Page, co-founders of Google, are in the No. 2 spot this year, closing in on Zuckerberg as they jump up one spot, from No. 3 in 2010. Eric Schmidt, who appeared on the list last year with the duo, has since been pushed out of the C.E.O’s office, replaced by Page. Despite reports of an anti-trust investigation, Google has been setting its sites on Facebook by concentrating on strategic initiatives, such as engineering social-networking features.

Rounding out the top five are Jeff Bezos, of Amazon, at No. 3, Tim Cook and Jonathan Ive, of Apple, at No. 4, and Twitter and Square founder Jack Dorsey, at No. 5.

Lady Gaga makes an appearance for the second year in a row. Coming in at No. 9, she is the highest-ranking woman on the list, in front of J. K. Rowling at No. 16, Sheryl Sandberg, of Facebook, at No. 26, Angela Ahrendts with Christopher Bailey, of Burberry, at No. 30, Natalie Massenet at No. 32, and Kara Swisher with Walt Mossberg at No. 40. At 25 years old, Gaga is also the youngest person on the list — not a surprise for someone whose fans managed to crash Amazon’s servers in their desperation to download her third album.

Youthful energy is spread throughout this year’s list with 15 members under the age of 40, including Zuckerberg, Brin and Page, Dorsey, Lady Gaga, Andrew Mason, Sean Parker, Ryan Kavanaugh, Jeremy Stoppelman, Ashton Kutcher, Dennis Crowley, Daniel Ek, Mikael Hed and Niklas Hed, and Justin Timberlake.

There are 14 billionaires on the list: Zuckerberg, Brin and Page, Bezos, Mark Pincus, Michael Moritz, J. K. Rowling, Jim Breyer, Reid Hoffman, Herbert Allen III, Yuri Milner, Robin Li, Parker, and Peter Thiel.

Five member of the New Establishment are actively involved in space exploration, including Brin, Elon Musk, Bezos, Thiel, and Dennis Crowley. Eight of the New Establishment nominees can count themselves members of the ever growing Stanford Mafia; they include Brin, Page, Reed Hastings, Jim Breyer, Hoffman, Musk, Thiel, and John Hennessy.

The New Establishment, Vanity Fair’s annual ranking of the top leaders of our time, is made up of owners, creators, buyers, thinkers, and innovators — the movers and shakers in the worlds of technology, media, business, politics, entertainment, and fashion. These men and women are the taste-makers and trendsetters, opinion formers and agenda creators, not to mention empire builders. Entry into the ranks of Vanity Fair’s list is based on a number of factors: wealth, influence, and philanthropy, as well as such intangibles as vision and the x factor.

The October issue of Vanity Fair will be on newsstands in New York and L.A. on September 1, and nationally and on the iPad September 6.


1. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook
2. Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Google
3. Jeff Bezos, Amazon
4. Tim Cook and Jonathan Ive, Apple
5. Jack Dorsey, Square, Twitter
6. Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, Andreessen Horowitz
7. Reed Hastings, Netflix
8. John Lasseter, Pixar, Walt Disney Animation Studios
9. Lady Gaga, singer
10. Dan Doctoroff, Bloomberg L.P.
11. Dick Costolo, Twitter
12. Mark Pincus, Zynga
13. Jim Breyer, Accel Partners
14. Tim Burton, Johnny Depp, and Graham King, Movies
15. Michael Moritz, Sequoia Capital
16. J. K. Rowling, Harry Potter
17. Trey Parker and Matt Stone, South Park
18. Reid Hoffman, Greylock Partners, LinkedIn
19. Herb Allen III, Allen & Co.
20. Judd Apatow, Apatow Productions
21. Jay-Z, Roc Nation
22. Todd Phillips, Green Hat Films
23. Yuri Milner, DST Global
24. J. J. Abrams, writer, director, producer
25. Robin Li, Baidu
26. Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook
27. Andrew Mason, Groupon
28. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, television
29. Mark Wahlberg and Stephen Levinson, Leverage
30. Angela Ahrendts and Christopher Bailey, Burberry
31. Elon Musk, Tesla Motors, Space X
32. Natalie Massenet, Net-a-Porter Group
33. Paul Graham, Y Combinator
34. Sean Parker, entrepreneur
35. Fred Wilson, Union Square Ventures, Flatiron Partners
36. Peter Thiel, Founders Fund, Clarium Capital Management
37. Peter Jackson, Wingnut Films
38. Ryan Kavanaugh, Relativity Media
39. Mike Allen, Politico
40. Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher, All Things D
41. John Hennessy, Stanford University
42. Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp
43. Ashton Kutcher, actor, investor
44. Tyler Perry, director, producer, writer, actor
45. Dennis Crowley, Foursquare
46. Kevin Ryan, Gilt Groupe
47. Daniel Ek, Spotify
48. Henry Blodget, Business Insider
49. Mikael Hed, Niklas Hed, and Peter Vesterbacka, Rovio
50. Justin Timberlake, singer, actor


Embattled News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch in the Top 5

NEW YORK, N.Y. — This year Vanity Fair inaugurates a list of the Powers That Be. These are the people who have shaped the world we live in today — and continue to wield enormous influence. Many are longtime New Establishment members, and their destinies are intertwined with the members of this year’s New Establishment.

Steve Jobs, of Apple, holds the top spot on the list of the Powers That Be. Since Jobs took control of the company 14 years ago, the stock’s share price has risen more than 6,500 percent. At the height of the debt crisis in late July, Apple had more cash on hand than the U.S. government.

Bernard Arnault, of luxury-goods company LVMH, ranks in the No. 2 spot. As an overseer of countless enduring luxury brands, Arnault has left his mark on the industry. Last year he spent $2 billion to accumulate a 20 percent stake in family-controlled but publicly traded Hermès.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is No.3 on this year’s list while News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch comes in at No. 4. The tumultuous News of the World scandals this year have shaken the media baron, but also shown his staying power in the face of just about anything. Brian Roberts and Steve Burke, of Comcast, NBCUniversal, who recently acquired the U.S. media rights to the Olympic Games through 2020, are No. 5.

Jill Abramson is the highest-ranking woman out of six on the list, at No. 9. She is followed by Angelina Jolie with Brad Pitt at No. 11, Sue Naegle with Richard Plepler and Michael Lombardo at No. 15, Anne Sweeney with George Bodenheimer at No. 22, Bonnie Hammer at No. 24, and Arianna Huffington with Tim Armstrong at No. 25.

Because some power is permanent, Vanity Fair nominates a number of regulars to the Hall of Fame this year. Warren Buffett, of Berkshire Hathaway, joins Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg, Tom Ford, actor Tom Hanks, and designer Karl Lagerfeld. Network impresario Oprah Winfrey, Jeffrey Katzenberg, of DreamWorks Animation, and talk-show host Charlie Rose all make the ranks as well.

The October issue of Vanity Fair will be on newsstands in New York and L.A. on September 1, and nationally and on the iPad September 6.


1. Steve Jobs, Apple
2. Bernard Arnault, LVMH
3. Michael Bloomberg, mayor, New York City
4. Rupert Murdoch, News Corporation
5. Brian Roberts and Steve Burke, Comcast, NBCUniversal
6. François-Henri Pinault, PPR
7. Bob Iger, Walt Disney Company
8. Jeffrey Bewkes, Time Warner
9. Jill Abramson, The New York Times
10. Steve Ballmer, Microsoft
11. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, movies, philanthropy
12. Diego Della Valle, Tod’s
13. Roman Abramovich, investments
14. Mickey Drexler, J. Crew
15. Richard Plepler, Sue Naegle, and Michael Lombardo, HBO
16. Larry Gagosian, Gagosian Gallery
17. Harvey and Bob Weinstein, the Weinstein Company
18. Marc Jacobs, designer
19. Lorne Michaels, Saturday Night Live
20. David Zaslav, Discovery Communications
21. Jean Pigozzi, investments, art
22. George Bodenheimer and Anne Sweeney, Disney Media Networks
23. Vivi Nevo, NV Investments
24. Bonnie Hammer, NBCU Cable Entertainment and Cable Studios
25. Tim Armstrong and Arianna Huffington, AOL Huffington Post Media Group


Edgar Bronfman Jr., Warner Music Group
Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway
Ron Conway, angel investor
Philippe Dauman, Viacom
Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg, IAC, DVF
John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
Larry Ellison, Oracle Corporation
Tom Ford, designer/filmmaker
Ted Forstmann, IMG Worldwide
Tom Freston, Firefly3
Brian Grazer and Ron Howard, Imagine Entertainment
Tom Hanks, actor
Jeffrey Katzenberg, DreamWorks Animation
Vinod Khosla, Khosla Ventures
Karl Lagerfeld, Chanel
Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren
John Malone, Liberty Media
Ron Meyer, Universal Studios
Leslie Moonves, CBS
Ronald Perelman, MacAndrews and Forbes
Miuccia Prada, Prada
Charlie Rose, talk-show host
Eric Schmidt, Google
Terry Semel, investor
Oprah Winfrey, OWN

(Full disclosure: Readers who look closely at the list will notice that all things ATD senior editor Peter Kafka is listed as a contributor. This is true! Also true: Peter wrote biographical entries for several people on the list, but has zero input on its composition. He tells us he had no idea that we were being considered for inclusion, and we believe him. He also says that had he been asked for his opinion, he would have voted for us, his bosses, to be included. We also believe that.)

Microsoft’s Touchscreen Revolution Now Not Quite So Revolutionary

This post is by from ReadWriteWeb

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

In June, Microsoft unveiled the latest version of its Windows operating system: Windows 8. This version of Windows will introduce touchscreen technology into the Windows user interface (UI), including desktop and laptop computers. Touchscreens have become popular in smartphones and tablets, primarily due to Apple’s iOS. But does it make sense to reach out and touch your desktop computer screen in order to navigate or browse? In June, Microsoft was giving a resounding YES to that question. Now, it’s more like a nervous MAYBE.

Microsoft’s Steven Sinofsky attempted to explain today how the new touchscreen UI – which he dubbed the "Metro style" – will co-exist with the old style point-and-click Windows UI. The two interfaces are night and day. The touchscreen one is relatively simple and app-centric, the traditional one is complex and file-centric. He ended up hedging his bets, which is what Microsoft is now doing in its design goals for Windows 8.


Here are screenshots of the two interfaces, the touchscreen first and then latest version of Ye Olde style below.

Windows 8 "Metro style"

Windows 8 old-school style

Sinofsky talked about the need to do "a balancing act" between the two UIs. Which is entirely reasonable, because of the huge install base of Windows and the fact that a mouse and file system interface are going to be very useful things to have in PCs for some time to come. It’s far more efficient to use a mouse to find that file you need to work on, than use your fingers to flip through files via touchscreen.

What’s curious is Sinofsky’s statement that "we chose to take the approach of building a design without compromise." Using both UIs, he wrote, "truly affords you the best of the two worlds we see today."

Others have rightly pointed out that far from being a "no compromises" design decision, it’s the exact definition of compromising.

When Windows 8 was announced, Microsoft said it was “a reimagining of Windows.” A lot of people applauded Microsoft for bravely making a big leap from the traditional Windows interface into touchscreen technology. Even Apple hasn’t made that leap, although perhaps for good reason.

However now Microsoft has backed off from the hype and is adopting a more conservative approach. It doesn’t want to alienate its millions of users, or the tens of thousands of developers who build on the Windows platform. That makes a lot of sense. But it’s no longer a revolution in desktop computer design. Oh well, perhaps in Windows 9…


Hands-On: At The U.S. Open With The Olympus E-PM1

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


Olympus is trying to do with their new E-PMT1 PEN Mini camera what other manufacturers already have: bring DSLR power to the masses. It’s their smallest Micro Four Thirds camera to date, and it’s definitely got its proverbial sights set on the mass market — and the fact that it comes in six colors certainly doesn’t hurt. Olympus was kind enough to let me play with an E-PM1 and a variety of lenses at the U.S. Open of all places, and here are a few of my quick impressions.

The body is a bit on the plasticky side, but it fortunately doesn’t feel like it will fall apart at the seams either. Corners had to be cut to keep the price down, and while the body probably could have been a bit sturdier, it feels robust enough to stand up to the rigors of everyday use. The rest of the package was spot on: it performed pretty nicely in most low light situations I found myself in, and the autofocus was nice and snappy.

As something of a novice photographer, I appreciated the simple terms that Olympus has peppered throughout its UI. While being asked to manually change shutter speed on a typical DSLR may elicit a clueless look from an aspiring photographer, Olympus makes it a cakewalk: just change the “Motion Control” setting (complete with self-explanatory icons) to achieve the desired effect. That said, the menu system was a bit confusing at times: after changing the art mode (Olympus’s name for filters) in the menu for example, you couldn’t use the same method to change it. Rather, you press a different button and change art mode from the settings it brings up.

The E-PM1′s iAuto mode is a boon to new users — while photos taken using it seem to err just a bit on the warm side, it reduces the amount of know-how needed to take nice shots. Different art modes also add an extra splash of fun to the PEN Mini, and while every camera has them, personal favorites like the tilt-shifting Diorama mode will help position it as the fun camera to use.

All things considered, I’m really starting to fall for the little guy. The problem with Olympus’ approach is that it’s terribly difficult to strike the right balance: water it down too much and pros won’t pick it up as a smaller alternative, but make it just a bit too complex and casual users won’t take the plunge. While not perfect, the E-PM1 seems to stick it mostly in that sweet spot. The Olympus E-PM1 is due for a September release, and will set photographers back $499.99.

E-Books Get More Interactive With Amazon’s New Author Q&A Feature

This post is by from ReadWriteWeb

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Amazon nudged the experience of reading books ever-so-slightly further into the future today. The company announced a new feature for its Kindle reading platform that lets readers ask authors questions about their books as they’re reading.

The new program, called @author, lets Kindle users highlight a passage and then ask the author a question about it via their Amazon author page or Twitter. Only questions as long as 100 characters can be asked from within the e-book itself, but more in-depth curiosities can be posted to the author’s official page on Amazon.


Of course, only a handful of questions will actually be answered directly by authors, but other readers are free to chime in and offer their take. If the writer does respond, readers will be notified by email.

If you’ve got something nasty to say, this probably isn’t the place to do it, as Amazon encourages readers to “behave as if you were a guest at a friend’s dinner party” and leave profanity and insults out of it.

The feature represents, as Nieman Journalism Lab so effectively put it, a step toward “a book culture that is increasingly author-driven” rather than one driven strictly by publishers or even necessarily books. Amazon is “is charting a new course for the publishing industry” by “commodifying the charisma of the authors who sell material on its platforms,” Nieman Lab’s Megan Garber writes.

Continues Garber:

Already we’re seeing new, largely tablet-driven publishing platforms challenging and transforming our assumptions about what a book is and can be; already we’re seeing publishing platforms that emphasize authors’ fan communities as value propositions unto themselves. @Author is the next step in that process: the digital commodification of authorship that takes place by way of community and conversation.

Amazon took a step toward social reading earlier this year with the quiet launch of Kind Profiles, which let users display their reading activity and connect with other readers in a Goodreads-style feature.

The @author feature is in limited beta right now, and appears to only be available on Kindle devices rather than from within the Kindle app on other platforms. Participating authors include Tim Ferris, Susan Orlean, Steven Johnson and about a dozen others.


Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac available September 6

This post is by Andru Edwards from Gear Live

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac

The folks over at Parallels have been hard at work on perfecting the software for OS X Lion, and now it's ready. Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac will go on sale on September 6th, bringing a bunch of Lion features to apps that you're running in Windows. Expect the ability to use Lion features like Full Screen, LaunchPad, and Mission Control with Windows programs, along with the ability to run multiple copies of OS X Lion and Windows at the same time. On the performance end of things, Parallels Desktop 7 is 60 percent faster than the previous version for resuming Windows, and 45 percent faster for 3D graphics. ALso new is improved 5.1 surround sound, and support for 7.1 surround as well.

On September 6th you'll be able to download a trial or full version of Parallels Desktop 7, as well as purchased boxed software from retailers. The standard price is $79.99, while the Switch to Mac edition is $99.99. If you're switching over from VMware Fusion (Parallels competitor) you'll get a special price of $49.99, and if you're upgrading from a previous version of Parallels, you also qualify for the $49.99 price. Lastly, if you're a student, you get it for $39.99.

We'll be testing out all of the new features of Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac, and will report back with our thoughts soon.


Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac available September 6 originally appeared on Gear Live on Wed, August 31, 2011 – 6:29:53

Assistly For Salesforce Launches On AppExchange

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


Assistly, the cloud-based customer support platform that’s backed by Bullpen Capital, Index Ventures, Salesforce, as well as several other angels and VCs, launched version 2.0 of its platform back in July, along with rolling out a new pricing model that includes a full-featured version of its service for free.

Today, the summer features keep on rolling out for Assistly, which today announced that it would be adding two-way integration with Salesforce. Assistly for Salesforce is an AppExchange app that, according to the Assistly blog, will enable sales and support teams to “share a complete view of the customer” — in other words, customer support teams can now see data, like customer contact info and status while working on cases — direct from Salesforce. The app will also integrate with Salesforce Chatter to make it easy to involve one’s entire company in customer support, and allow users to send status updates and set rules to automatically generate Chatter messages as customer support cases age.

With Assistly for Salesforce, users can view contact history and more without having to leave Assistly, and likewise, customer support teams can view information from Salesforce — all in an effort to offer a more consistent experience to the customer. Organizations can then use Assistly to show where a customer is in the sales cycle, the status or value of that customer to the company, and the customer’s contact information. In realtime.

Assistly has had an ongoing partnership with Salesforce, and this announcement is a logical extention of the strategic investment Salesforce has made in Assistly — and shows yet another partnership forged by Salesforce to continue adding products and services that complement its existing service.

Since launching in September of last year and taking on new capital, Assistly has brought on companies like Yelp, Etsy, 37signals, Pandora, Vimeo, and Spotify as paying customers. The startup also counts Mark Cuban and David Liu as advisors.

For more, check out the video below:

Launch Date:

Assistly makes it easy for teams and Whole Companies to support customers right from the browser, via email, phone, chat, web, Facebook and Twitter.

The company provides hosted, cloud-based customer…

Learn more

Launch Date:

23/6/2004, NYSE:crm

Salesforce is an enterprise cloud computing company that provides business software on a subscription basis. The company is best known for its on-demand Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions.


Learn more

Football! Sportcaster turns Twitter into your gameday play-by-play

This post is by Meghan Kelly from VentureBeat

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

SportcasterFootball, the season for pigskins, tailgates and letters painted on stomachs, is among us  OneLouder, the maker of Tweetcaster, is gearing up for game time with a new free mobile app launched today. It’s called Sportcaster and isn’t based on stats from ESPN or commentary from John Madden. Instead, it’s based on Twitter’s API. Using a custom built back-end engine, the app pulls tweets from coaches, players, dedicated sports media and others to give fans up to the minute action happening on the field.

“You’re way behind if you’re not looking at [information] on twitter. Twitter is breaking news,” Evan Conway, president of OneLouder, told VentureBeat in an interview.

Twitter is realtime. It’s 140 characters, there’s no fluff, and it’s what’s happening now. Sportcaster, which is now available on Android devices and the iPhone, taps into Twitter’s application programming interface (API). You can choose to see streams based on a particular game. Narrow the coverage further by specifying a particular team, or whether you want updates from coaches, players or media only.

“If you want a score or a game recap, that’s kind of yesterday’s app,” said Conway. Despite this, Sportcaster does allow you check schedules and scores that are aggregated through licensed content.

What’s great for sports fans is you don’t need a Twitter account to reap the benefits of quick, brash and entertaining play-by-plays. Conway noted 95 percent of the population knows of Twitter, but only 13 percent use it, a stat he found here. According to him, a good majority of these people not using Twitter are sports fans. The app doesn’t discriminate if you’re not a Tweeter.

The sports space is a dense one, however, with big wigs like ESPN, network sports programing and Twackle by Sports Illustrated, which have their own apps in the App Store. Conway even admitted saying, “Everyone is an indirect competitor.”

But not everyone taps into the collective knowledge of people on the ground. Sure, reporters are on the field, getting interviews, but tweets originating from the horse’s mouth are uncensored, unedited and probably make for an interesting retweet, if you choose to connect your Twitter to the app. It also lets player watch for tweets specifically associated with Fantasy Football to help them decide on trades and who to Sportcaster Tweetsbench before the weekly deadline arrives.

So the app is cool. But with Twitter sloughing off third party apps, is OneLouder concerned with life in the Twitter API ecosystem?

“I’d be more concerned about Tweetcaster than I would about [Sportcaster],” he said. Tweetcaster is OneLouder’s iPhone app competing directly with Twitter’s.

“Sportcaster, in my opinion, does exactly what Twitter wants developers to do. Twitter came out and said 5 different ways they want devs to use their API and one of them is to aggregate their streaming content in interesting ways.”

Conway sees his app as a combination of technology, art and filtration that play into Twitter’s strengths. In fact, he suspects that Sportcaster will attract people to sign up for Twitter. He even sees Twitter’s user base growing from 13 percent  of the population aware of Twitter to 25 percent or more and says, “If they cut that off, that will be the beginning of the end.” But he also accepts that the ecosystem is the way it is.

“I don’t believe [Twitter] has been evil doing this,” he explained, “They’ve been a bit clumsy, kind of knocking devs over along the way, but as long as they open their API’s and let us compete, then that’s just kind of the nature of the beast.”

In the future, Conway plans to expand Sportcaster into new sports verticals, such as basketball and further fleshing out their college sports offerings. A Sportcaster iPad app is also in the works.

Filed under: mobile

Former Google China chief raises $180M for startup incubator

This post is by from VentureBeat

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Kai-Fu Lee, the former head of Google China, has just finished a $180 million fund-raise for Innovation Works, a startup incubator for he founded two years ago.

Innovation Works is an accelerator for early-stage web and tech companies in China. The firm provides advisement, funding and support services to would-be entrepreneurs trying to get their own startups off the ground.

“Our unique ‘incubation-plus-investment’ model has not only produced a pipeline of high-quality projects but also enabled local early-stage startup teams to grow quickly with the help of our 360-degree mentoring services, in effect creating the entrepreneurial academy for Chinese startups,” said Lee in a release.

In mid-2009, Lee announced he was leaving Google after 4 years with the company. The brilliant computer scientist had been involved with since its inception and had previously worked at Microsoft and Apple.

At the time Lee exited, China’s struggles with the web were gaining prominence in Western media. The country’s censorship and surveillance program, called the Golden Shield Project drew the rancor of outsiders, while citizens did their best to circumvent censorship software and website bans.

Lee chose this tumultuous time to focus on one of China’s greatest strengths: its human capital. He soon announced he would be heading up Innovation Works, a new incubator just for Chinese startups.

Lee has a much deeper understanding of the Chinese entrepreneurial ecosystem than almost anyone else, and he knew the Western incubator model wouldn’t work in China for a number of reasons, which Lee highlighted in a 2009 interview with VentureBeat.

“Y Combinator would have a very hard time making it in China,” Lee said. “It would have a hard time finding the startups and qualified people to fund. It could interview hundreds and find only two.”

However, Innovation Works has seen definite success in its two years of operation. So far, the organization has incubated 34 companies. Nine of those companies have secured additional rounds of funding from third-party venture capital firms.

Investors in the Innovation Works fund run the gamut from multinational corporations to Silicon Valley elites. These entities include Sequoia Capital, Foxconn, SAP, Motorola, Silicon Valley Bank, Ron Conway and former executives from well-known web properties including Google, YouTube and Facebook.

The Innovation Works fund has been co-founded and co-managed by Innovation Works and investor WI Harper Group.

Stay tuned for an exclusive interview with Kai-Fu Lee on his experiences so far and how he sees entrepreneurship playing a role in the future of China’s Internet.

Filed under: deals, VentureBeat

Download iOS 5 beta 7 9a5313e now!

This post is by Andru Edwards from Gear Live

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

ios 5 beta 7 9a5313e

Apple has been busy updating their Dev Center with another iOS 5 beta update, and today developers can go and grab iOS 5 beta 7. If you are already running beta 5 or later, then you can perform an over-the-air (OTA) update directly from your device, with no need to use iTunes. You can now grab iOS 5 beta 7 for iPad, iPhone, iPod touch, and Apple TV, alongside iTunes 10.5 beta 7 and Xcode 4.2 Developer Preview 7 for both Snow Leopard (4C177) and Lion (4D177b.)


Download iOS 5 beta 7 9a5313e now! originally appeared on Gear Live on Wed, August 31, 2011 – 5:10:42

MobiTV’s IPO filing is not a pretty picture

This post is by from GigaOM

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Mobile video provider MobiTV became the latest in a string of companies to announce plans to go public Wednesday, filing an S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The company hopes to raise $75 million through the initial public offering of its stock.

First, the good news: MobiTV revenues are gradually growing, and its losses are gradually declining. The mobile video company reported full-year 2010 revenues of $66.8 million, which was up from $62.5 million a year before. For the first half of this year, MobiTV’s sales grew to $36.9 million, up from $31.5 million in the first six months of 2010. Meanwhile, its net loss for the first half declined to $8.1 million, compared to $9.4 million a year earlier. The company has $32 million in cash on hand, after raising $115 million over the last decade.

That said, MobiTV suffers a severe lack of diversity in its revenue streams, and faces the distinct possibility that it could lose all of its distribution partners under contract over the next 18 months. From the filing:

“We depend on three customers for most of our revenue and if any of those customers were to limit or terminate their relationship with us, or to replace our service with a competitor’s service or the customer’s own service, it could be difficult or impossible for us to replace that revenue. We depend on our key customers, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile, for the substantial majority of our revenue.”

How much revenue is wrapped up in those three key customers? According to MobiTV, Sprint represented 54 percent of its revenues in 2010, while the combined AT&T and T-Mobile made up 24 percent of its sales in 2010 and 42 percent in the first half of 2011.

Even worse, those contracts are all set to expire over the next 18 months. In September 2012, MobiTV’s deal with Sprint moves to a month-by-month contract. Its T-Mobile agreement will automatically renew for a one-year term in December 2011, and will be subject to T-Mobile’s right to terminate on 30 days notice after that. Meanwhile, its agreement with AT&T ends in January 2013. And as MobiTV writes:

“If any one of these Tier 1 customers chose not to continue to use our services, or limited its use of our services, or if it replaced our services with a service provided by another company or by the customer itself, it would be difficult or impossible for us to replace that revenue because there are a limited number of such Tier 1 customers. Any such development would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.”

At the same time, consumers are increasingly turning to mobile video services from alternative over-the-top providers such as Netflix and Hulu Plus that aren’t dependent on striking deals with major carriers. And operators such as Time Warner Cable and Cablevision, as well as programmers like ESPN, are releasing mobile apps that stream live TV feeds to mobile devices like the iPad. In other words, MobiTV’s customers have more choices than ever for mobile content, at the same time carrier partners have to decide whether or not they want to continue supporting the service. All of which raises the question: Will MobiTV be able to grow — or even maintain — its revenues in an increasingly dynamic market for mobile video?

Photo courtesy of Flickr user Travis Isaacs.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

A Parallels World Where Windows Zips on Macs

This post is by from AllThingsD » Walt Mossberg

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Apple’s Macintosh computers have long been able to run Windows, in addition to their native operating system, Mac OS X. But the process has sometimes been clumsy, slow or taxing to the machine and it hasn’t been tailored to the new Lion version of Apple’s OS.

Now, the most popular utility for running Windows programs simultaneously with Mac programs has been updated in a speedier version that takes advantage of some Lion features. It’s called Parallels Desktop 7 for Mac, and it goes on sale Sept. 1, as a $50 upgrade for current Parallels users and on Sept. 6 for new users at $80. The product comes from a Seattle company of the same name.

[ See post to watch video ]

I’ve been testing the new Parallels 7 on last year’s version of the MacBook Air laptop, running Lion with 4 gigabytes of memory. That’s the recommended amount of memory for running Windows 7, the version of Windows I tested.

In my tests, this latest Parallels edition ran Windows quickly and smoothly, and integrated well with some of Lion’s new features, even though my test Mac isn’t the fastest Apple laptop available today.

For instance, while I’m writing this in a Mac program on the Air, I’m simultaneously running the Windows-only Internet Explorer Web browser, and a couple of other Windows programs, with no discernible slowdown in any of them. I can easily recommend Parallels 7 to Mac users who need to use Windows programs some of the time.


Parallels Desktop 7 lets Windows programs, like Excel on the left, appear on the Mac as if they were Mac programs, without the Windows desktop.

I also tested a new companion Parallels Mobile iPad and iPhone app, which allows you to remotely control both your Mac and Windows running on your Mac. I am less sanguine about this product, which also goes on sale Thursday, for an introductory price of $5 (the regular price is $20). It did work, but like similar mobile programs for controlling PCs, I found it a bit awkward to use.

Parallels works by creating a so-called virtual machine inside your Mac. Within this virtual machine, you can install a copy of Windows you’ve purchased and it will behave like a faux Windows computer, compatible with the same programs as a physical Windows PC.

You can run Windows programs on your Mac either in one large window that displays the Windows desktop and taskbar, or in a mode that allows the Windows programs you run to simply appear on the Mac as if they were Mac programs, without the Windows desktop.

Going Back and Forth

Either way, you can switch back and forth between this virtual Windows computer and your regular Mac environment. You can copy and paste material between Mac programs and Windows programs, and drag files between the two operating systems. You can even open files from the Mac side of the machine in Windows programs, provided they are compatible.

This isn’t the same as another method for running Windows on a Mac, called Boot Camp—a built-in feature of the Mac designed by Apple. Boot Camp, which also requires you to purchase and install Windows, has two big advantages over Parallels: It’s free, and it dedicates the Mac’s hardware solely to Windows, so it runs Windows programs even faster.

But it has a big disadvantage. It doesn’t allow you to run both operating systems simultaneously, or copy and paste material between them. With Boot Camp, if you want to switch between the Mac OS and Windows, you have to reboot the Mac.

I found that the new Parallels started and resumed Windows much faster than its predecessor. When launching Windows, the Mac no longer slowed to a crawl, as it had in past versions.

All Windows 7 programs I tested launched and ran quickly and smoothly, and the fancy visual effects in Windows 7, such as mini-previews for icons in the taskbar, worked great.

Playing Solitaire

I was able to run the Windows versions of Microsoft Office (including Outlook), Quicken, and many other programs. I also easily ran such Windows-only programs as IE, Windows Media Player and even the venerable Windows Solitaire.

In addition, the new Parallels for the first time can take advantage of the Mac’s built-in webcam.

It has a new wizard for creating a virtual machine. And now, it will even allow you to buy, download and install Windows right from within Parallels. Previously, you had to obtain Windows separately. This is a big improvement, in my view.

Windows in Launchpad

Windows, and Windows programs, can be displayed in Lion’s new Launchpad feature, which mimics the main screen of an iPad. They also show up and behave like Mac programs in Lion’s new Mission Control feature, which shows all the programs running on the Mac in miniature. Windows programs can also run in Lion’s new full-screen mode.

The companion iPad app has been enhanced so it not only remotely controls the virtual machine, but the entire Mac. This has some advantages, such as allowing you to view Flash videos that the iPad normally can’t play, by playing them remotely on the computer.

But I found that, as on other iPad apps for remotely controlling computers, controlling PC and Mac screens is difficult using iPad gestures.

Many Virtual Machines

Parallels 7 can create and run multiple virtual machines, and also handle operating systems other than Windows. For instance, I was able to run Linux and an open-source version of Google’s Chrome OS on my Mac using Parallels. At one point in my tests, I had four operating systems running at once, and could control all four from an iPad.

Oddly, the new Parallels can even run a second, virtual copy of Lion, on a Lion-equipped Mac, though this would mainly be of interest to developers testing products.

(Apple says Lion won’t work in a virtual machine running on a PC.)

There are a couple of drawbacks to Parallels 7. As in prior versions, it can’t run the most graphics-intensive Windows games and other programs, so heavy-duty gamers will do better with Boot Camp or a physical Windows PC. And I found it wouldn’t share my Verizon 4G data modem with the Mac OS.

If you’re likely to be using Windows most of the time, it’s best to just use a regular Windows PC. But for Mac users who need to run a few Windows programs some of the time, Parallels 7 is a fine product.

Write to Walt at

High-Definition Streaming

This post is by from AllThingsD » Walt Mossberg

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post


I am curious if any of those three set-top boxes you reviewed last week offer the movies in high definition.


All of them do. If a service included on the box streams or downloads in high definition and you have an HDTV and the proper cable connection (usually an HDMI cable), then all three will output the video in high definition. The top-of-the-line Roku I tested (called the XS) and the Boxee Box support what’s called 1080p resolution, while the Apple TV and the entry-level Roku HD only support 720p. However, most experts say that average people, sitting at an average distance from a TV, can’t tell the difference between these two types of HD.


I have elderly parents who can’t seem to be able to use a mobile phone, and become very frustrated. Is there a phone that seniors can see and work? It needs to be simple.


The best-known cellphone for seniors is called Jitterbug. It offers large buttons and a variety of operator-assisted features. We tested and generally liked an earlier model. The phone is sold by GreatCall, at, for $100. Another company, Doro, makes less expensive models with large buttons aimed at seniors. See this page. The Doro phones are also sold by a carrier called Consumer Cellular, which promises low rates and offers discounts to members of AARP. See here.


What is the preferred way to pair iPad 2 with a TV? By using the AirPlay feature or through the Apple HDMI adapter? Also, the upcoming iOS 5 operating system comes with this functionality built in, right?


Each method is a bit different. AirPlay, which requires a $99 Apple TV, wirelessly beams a particular video you’re playing on the iPad 2 to a TV. The Apple HDMI adapter, formally called the Digital AV adapter, which costs $39 and requires an HDMI cable, beams the entire screen of the device to the TV. It works on both iPads, as well as on the iPhone 4 and the latest generation iPod Touch, and doesn’t require an Apple TV. In both cases, some video providers block the video stream from going to the TV, presumably due to their business policies or legal issues.

In the forthcoming iOS 5 operating system, using Airplay and an Apple TV will enable full-screen mirroring on a TV from an iPad 2, just as the physical adapter does today.


Google Quietly Rolls Out The Chrome Extension To Bring +1 To The Entire Web

This post is by from TechCrunch

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

Screen Shot 2011-08-31 at 5.40.01 PM

You may recall that back in May, we spotted something in Google’s “Dear Sophie” commercial: an unreleased +1 Chrome extension. This was pre-Google+, when the +1 button still didn’t do a whole lot, so even I forgot about the extension over the past few months. But very quietly, Google actually launched it yesterday.

There was no blog post, no featured placement in the Chrome Web Store — pretty much no fanfare beyond Google SVP of Chrome, Sundar Pichai, posting a link to it on Google+. But it has the potential to be a bigger deal than it seems on the surface.

As the tagline indicates, the Google +1 Button extension allows you to “+1 a web page, anywhere you go on the web”. That’s important. You no longer have to rely on a site to implement the +1 Button, you can invoke the functionality through your browser. Imagine if Facebook made their own browser and offered an extension to “Like” any page on the web through it — same idea (and one that I still suspect will happen sooner or later).

Right now, the +1 Button just shares content you like on the web. But eventually, the plan is to look at this data as a way to affect Google Search itself potentially. That’s huge. The button also is starting to play a role in how Google serves up advertising to you. Again, huge — though these concepts may make people wary of such a button.

As Google notes in their description of the app:

In addition to the practices described in the Google +1 Button Privacy Policy, by installing this extension, all of the pages and URLs you visit will be sent to Google in order to retrieve +1 information.

Yes, you read that correctly, “all of the pages and URLs you visit will be sent to Google” — nefarious or not, that will worry some people.

And while the +1 Buttons for websites just added the functionality to share your Google+ Circles, the extension doesn’t yet offer that — but I assume it will. It does offer +1 counts though already, which is nice.

Find the extension here. Again, it’s Chrome only for now, we’ll see if they create ones for Firefox, IE, and Safari as well.

Launch Date:

25/8/2004, NASDAQ:GOOG

Google provides search and advertising services, which together aim to organize and monetize the world’s information. In addition to its dominant search engine, it offers a plethora of…

Learn more

Linux Kernel Host Breached

This post is by from ReadWriteWeb

Click here to view on the original site: Original Post

tux-sm.pngThe site that hosts the Linux kernel’s source code, was compromised earlier this month. The discovery was made on August 28th, and steps are being taken now to enhance security for the site and recovery is underway. The kernel code repositories are believed to be unaffected.

According to an unattributed post on the front page of, intruders managed to gain access via a compromised user credential. It’s currently unknown how the attacker managed to escalate to root access.


After gaining access, the attacker modified files related to SSH services and added a trojan startup file to the system startup scripts. The trojan was discovered due to an error showing in a system log from a program not actually installed on the server (Xnest).

The status now is that the compromised systems are offline and being restored from pristine backups. All boxes on will be getting full re-installs, and analysis is being done of the code to make sure that nothing has been modified. Authorities have also been notified about the breach.

Why it Doesn’t Matter (Much)

Before anyone gets in a tizzy about the compromise, it’s worth pointing out that while this is an enormous inconvenience for the kernel folks and site admins it’s not going to affect enterprises that run Linux in production.

Even if the attacker managed to compromise the code repository, almost all production servers are running kernels provided by vendors like Red Hat and SUSE. Those kernels were patched, compiled and tested long before this breach. The only way someone might see this is if they’re testing the most current kernels or compiling their own. And, again, only if the code was actually compromised – which is considered unlikely at the moment.

There’s also the small matter of the source control system used to manage the kernel source. As Jon Corbet writes, “The code for the kernel (and for many other projects) is managed with the “git” source code management system. And git does not allow the code to be modified by third parties without people knowing about it.”

Files managed by git have a cryptographic hash associated with them. Every time the file changes, the hash changes. When developers download the files, they’d get a warning from their instance of git that something had been changed.

As Corbet points out in his post, may seem like where kernel development is done – but it’s not. It’s the centralized repository for all the developers who are doing kernel development on their own machines.

Why it Does Matter

Why is it worth reporting? Obviously, the fact that the site hosting the Linux kernel is going to be considered news. But really, any major breach is worth examining since it shows how attackers work and how they might be trying to compromise your systems. has pretty good security, but it just goes to show that a target that has sufficiently motivated attackers may be compromised.

It’s not yet known how the attackers managed to gain root access. Once that’s known, we’ll be sure to report the issue so companies that might be at risk can update immediately.

Disclaimer: is funded by the Linux Foundation, and I do contract work for the Linux Foundation though I am not connected to management in any way.